Part one — the noticing.
A few years ago I was doing what I still do for a living. Looking at data. Consumer data, behavioural data, the kind of aggregated anonymised numbers that tell you what a million people are doing with their time and their money when they don't think anybody is watching. I was training models on wardrobe repurchase cycles for a larger brief, and a pattern kept falling out of the dataset that didn't fit the story the brands were telling.
The pattern was this: young urban Indian consumers were re-purchasing athleisure roughly twice as often as any other category. Not because they loved it that much — the reviews were full of complaints about pilling, shape loss, and fabrics that didn't survive six months. They were re-purchasing because they were wearing the pieces to death. These pieces were in play for huge chunks of the day. Gym, yes, but also in the cafe, at the co-working space, to collect a parcel, to run out for biryani. The data said athleisure wasn't workout gear for this demographic. It was everyday wear.
I remember sitting with that number for a while. Nobody I knew in the category was acting on it.
Part two — the question.
Here's the thing about being a data scientist. You get trained to ask "so what?" seventeen times in a row until something useful falls out. I kept asking. If these consumers are spending forty to sixty percent of their day in this stuff, and the category is failing them on quality, and the design language is stuck in a 2014 Western performance brief, why hasn't anybody built the thing they'd actually want?
The easy answer is "it's not worth it". But the numbers said otherwise. The demand existed, the price sensitivity was wider than people thought, and the gap between what was being sold and what the customer actually lived in was enormous. So the real answer was probably some mixture of: nobody with the fashion sensibility to build it had the operator's willingness to manufacture athleisure; and nobody with the operator's instinct had the taste to not reproduce the same old thing.
The question that made me start was very small. Why isn't anyone designing for the hours that actually matter?
I wasn't angry. I was curious.
I want to be honest about the tone of how this started, because I think it matters. I didn't approach this as a rebellion. I'm not angry at Nike, Puma, or the existing Indian brands. They built what they built for the world they were shipping into. Athleisure as a category wasn't always fourteen-hour uniform. That's a recent shift.
What I had was the calm version of curiosity. An analyst's version. A let me see if I can build one of these and test the thesis version. ZAFLICK didn't start as a protest brand. It started as an experiment.
Part three — the first experiments.
I did the thing everybody does when they have an idea. I wrote it down in a notebook. I talked to friends. Most of them nodded politely. Some of them said "okay but do you know how hard manufacturing is". Those were the useful ones.
I started with fabric. Not logo, not Instagram, not a brand deck. Fabric. I reached out to every decent mill I could find in India and asked for swatches. I washed them, I rubbed them, I wore them under clothes for days. I learned more about Martindale abrasion ratings, yarn twist, rPET sourcing, and double-knit construction in three months than I had in my life.
The first real "oh" moment happened in front of a washing machine. I'd ordered a dozen samples, washed them five times each, and laid them out on the bedroom floor. The difference between a high-twist anti-pill knit and a low-twist mass-market knit was visible from across the room. One of them looked like a new piece of fabric. The other looked like it had lost a fight. I realised nobody in the Indian athleisure category at a mass-premium price point was using the first kind. They were all using some flavour of the second.
That was when the experiment stopped being an experiment. There was a clear product gap, I had a specific technical answer for it, and — most important — the work had started to feel fun rather than theoretical.
Part four — the design language.
Fabric was the backbone. Design was the next fight. I didn't want to make "quiet premium athleisure" — I think there's already too much beige in that corner. I didn't want to make "loud performance wear" either. I wanted pieces that had enough character that you'd want to wear them, and enough restraint that you could wear them all day.
The phrase that unlocked it for me was designed like a runway piece, built for a Tuesday. Spend the design calories where they matter — silhouette, print, proportion, finish — and then strip out everything else. No loud brand logos on the hip. No reflective performance piping. The innovation sits in the fabric and the cut, not on the surface.
I'd been staring at one of our sketch batches — the joggers, the oversized tee, the leggings with the paneled swirl — and it hit me that they had the same visual pull as a considered streetwear drop. They just happened to be built on high-twist rPET with a Martindale rating that would embarrass most of the category. That was the combination I wanted. More on that design philosophy here.
Part five — why Hyderabad.
A lot of Indian DTC brands default to Mumbai or Delhi because that's where the press, the fashion scene, and the venture money traditionally sit. I decided to build from Hyderabad deliberately.
One, I live here. It's home. You should build where you can get out of bed at 5am and still be awake at midnight because the work is keeping you going. That requires being in your own life, not commuting through someone else's.
Two, the city's changing fast. The consumer we're building for — the young professional who hits the gym, works on a laptop half the day, and has a genuine design sensibility — is everywhere in Hyderabad now. Gachibowli, Jubilee Hills, Kondapur. I get to test sketches and product with them in real life. It's our focus group and our launch city at the same time.
Three, Hyderabad has quietly become one of the better places in the country to run a brand. Talent pool, cost structure, access to manufacturing across Telangana, Andhra, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. Near-zero reasons to be anywhere else.
Part six — what's next.
We're launching with five pieces. Joggers, oversized tee, high-rise leggings, a printed sports bra, and a racerback tank. Small on purpose. Each one is getting engineered, sampled, and road-tested until it passes the three things we care about most: it doesn't pill, it passes the Coffee Shop Test, and you can forget you're wearing it for fourteen hours.
If you made it this far, come inside the brand while it's being built. The Inner Circle is the first 500 people on the waitlist. Those 500 get 20% off, name on the Founding 500 page, and actual influence on the line — colourways, silhouettes, what we make next. After that the tier closes and doesn't come back.
Founder · Hyderabad · 2026